RCE Salisbury - 2021
Environmental Justice for Indigenous Communities in the Americas
Region:
Americas
Country:
United States
Location(s):
Virtual Webinar
Address of focal point institution for project:
Host of the RCE location:
Bosserman Center for Conflict Resolution
1100 Camden Ave, Salisbury, MD 21801 USA
Bosserman Center for Conflict Resolution
1100 Camden Ave, Salisbury, MD 21801 USA
Ecosystem(s):
Target Audience:
Socioeconomic and environmental characteristics of the area :
The Eastern Shore began the twenty-first century with strong growth across multiple economic indicators. The region gained jobs at double the rate of the rest of the state from 2001 to 2007 while also outpacing the state in net business creation and keeping pace in wage growth. However, there are more people experiencing poverty now than there were 30 years ago. Maryland’s poverty rate is 19 percent higher than it was in 1990 – a year that the U.S. economy entered a recession – and there are nearly 200,000 more Marylanders trying to get by on incomes below the federal poverty line. Nearly every county in the state has a higher poverty rate than it had in 1990. While unemployment rates have continued to decline since the 2008 recession, wages often are not high enough to support a family. However, Maryland has a history of supporting effective programs that help lift people out of poverty. Working together, the state can do even better. Maryland is working strongly to support efforts to address the state’s many unmet needs and invest in the success of all Marylanders.
Description of sustainable development challenge(s) in the area the project addresses:
The State of Maryland has an estimated population of 6,052,177 people based on the most recent US census calculations. When broken down into regional populations, the Eastern Shore of Maryland region includes the following nine counties: Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Talbot, Caroline, Dorchester, Wicomico, Worcester, and Somerset. The sparse populated counties of the Eastern Shore of Maryland have a combined population of 454,889 or 13% of the state population.
Status:
Ongoing
Period:
February, 2021
Rationale:
Globally, there are an estimated “370 million indigenous peoples occupying 20 percent of the earth’s territory” and embody over 4,000 unique cultures of the 6,000 total cultures worldwide and seventy-five percent of the world’s 6,000 languages (United Nations, 2015). Although Indigenous communities represent the minority of the global population, they paradoxically also constitute the majority of cultural diversity. Additionally, some of the most biologically diverse regions of the world are inhabited by indigenous communities; the Biological 17 is a grouping of seventeen nations that contain more than sixty-five percent of the world’s resources and are populated by indigenous peoples. These countries in the Biological seventeen include “Australia, Brazil, China, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the Philippines, South Africa, Papua New Guinea, the United States of America, and Venezuela'' (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.). Many of the indigenous populations throughout Central and South America occupy rainforest areas, where there is also a large number of plants and animal species that are distinctive to the regions (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.).
Subsequently, the indigenous communities rely on their traditional link between the environment and their culture, which sustains a “spiritual, cultural, social and economic relationship with their traditional lands'' (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.), and creates a continued responsibility to preserve the lands for future generations. Communities are reliant on the protection of their land and resources to continue to the survival of their physical and cultural existence (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.). The lands that indigenous peoples inhabit account for over a quarter of the global world land area, but UN representatives state that environmental risks are leading to a climate apartheid that could risk communities with “overheating, hunger and conflict” and less socio-econmically advanced classes will be the ones to suffer from the impact of ecosystem changes and quickly degrading local livelihoods becasue of climate change (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2020). The symbiotic relationship between indigenous communities and the environment stands in danger from international, transnational, national, and local levels of resource destruction and threatens many communities’ dependency on the resources provided by the ecosystems (Indigenous Peoples and Their Communities, 2018).
Subsequently, the indigenous communities rely on their traditional link between the environment and their culture, which sustains a “spiritual, cultural, social and economic relationship with their traditional lands'' (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.), and creates a continued responsibility to preserve the lands for future generations. Communities are reliant on the protection of their land and resources to continue to the survival of their physical and cultural existence (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d.). The lands that indigenous peoples inhabit account for over a quarter of the global world land area, but UN representatives state that environmental risks are leading to a climate apartheid that could risk communities with “overheating, hunger and conflict” and less socio-econmically advanced classes will be the ones to suffer from the impact of ecosystem changes and quickly degrading local livelihoods becasue of climate change (United Nations Environmental Programme, 2020). The symbiotic relationship between indigenous communities and the environment stands in danger from international, transnational, national, and local levels of resource destruction and threatens many communities’ dependency on the resources provided by the ecosystems (Indigenous Peoples and Their Communities, 2018).
Objectives:
This webinar will focus on:
Global Reach of Indigenous Communities
Consistent Issues Regarding Environmental Degradation
Land Rights
New Technologies
Unsustainable Land Development
Climate Change
Harmful Impact On Work and Women
North America:
Maryland and the Eastern Shore: Piscataway and Accohannock
Alaska: The Gwich’in in Alaska
Arizona: San Carlos Apache
Haida Gwaii:: the Haida People
Central America:
Costa Rica: Brörán
Nicaragua: Miskito
Honduras: Lenca
South America:
Colombia: Huitotan, Arhaucos, etc.
Brazil: Mundurukú
Ecuador: Quechua
UN Led Initiatives
General Initiatives and Treaties
Agenda 2030
Green Climate Fund’s Indigenous Peoples Policy
Global Reach of Indigenous Communities
Consistent Issues Regarding Environmental Degradation
Land Rights
New Technologies
Unsustainable Land Development
Climate Change
Harmful Impact On Work and Women
North America:
Maryland and the Eastern Shore: Piscataway and Accohannock
Alaska: The Gwich’in in Alaska
Arizona: San Carlos Apache
Haida Gwaii:: the Haida People
Central America:
Costa Rica: Brörán
Nicaragua: Miskito
Honduras: Lenca
South America:
Colombia: Huitotan, Arhaucos, etc.
Brazil: Mundurukú
Ecuador: Quechua
UN Led Initiatives
General Initiatives and Treaties
Agenda 2030
Green Climate Fund’s Indigenous Peoples Policy
Activities and/or practices employed:
The webinar will be presented by a variety of academics, practitioners of conflict resolution. The authors will provide an overview of the climate and social justice issues that Indigenous communities struggle with and then moves onto specific examples across the Americas. The webinar aims to demonstrate many of the crucially harmful factors that impact indigenous communities and some movements to help remedy the longstanding detrimental effects. This webinar would be useful for those interested in an introductory sense of the indigenous groups in the Americas and their struggles with environmental justice.
Size of academic audience:
50+
Results:
In the Americas, humanity and nature are under pressure like never before. The increasing extraction of natural resources, such as wood, oil and minerals, as well as the expansion of soy, palm and other agro-commodity plantations, and of road, river and hydroelectric infrastructure projects, put significant pressure on the forest and the people who depend on it. Indigenous peoples and local communities have been guardians of their land. These people and their knowledge are key to sustainably protect forest forests from deforestation and the degradation of ecosystems. The authors of this webinar have investigated content on the different threats and vulnerabilities faced by Indigenous peoples and local communities in the Americas. The purpose of this webinar is to make visible the efforts of Indigenous peoples and local communities in the Americas to defend their territorial rights; raise public awareness about the violation of Indigenous and local land rights, deforestation and the degradation of ecosystems; and encourage research that promotes environmental and social awareness through data collection and analysis that show the importance of nature conservation and the necessary response to the effects of climate change.
Relationship to other RCE activities:
N/A
Funding:
This webinar is brought to you by RCE Salisbury.. RCE Salisbury, housed in the Bosserman Center for Conflict Resolution, is acknowledged by the United Nations University and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The Directors of RCE Salisbury are Dr. Brittany Foutz and Dr. Brian Polkinghorn. The Bosserman Center for Conflict Resolution is a nonprofit located in Salisbury, Maryland (USA) and the mission of the organization is to promote a systems-based approach to the effective analysis and practical resolution of social conflict. The Center utilizes a teaching hospital model whereby faculty and staff practitioners. Thank you to the Executive Director of the Bosserman Center, Dr. Brian Polkinghorn, for allowing this opportunity.
RCE Salisbury has also partnered with the United Nations Human Rights Council to exhibit this webinar.
RCE Salisbury has also partnered with the United Nations Human Rights Council to exhibit this webinar.
Pictures:
File Name | Caption for picture | Photo Credit |
---|---|---|
Screen Shot 2021-03-14 at 4.20.00 PM.png (1.94 MB) |
References and reference materials:
(https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs) and other themes of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)
SDG 1 - End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Indirect
SDG 2 - End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture
Indirect
SDG 3 - Ensure healthy lives and promote wellbeing for all at all ages
Indirect
SDG 4 - Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Indirect
SDG 6 - Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Indirect
SDG 12 - Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Indirect
SDG 13 - Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
Indirect
SDG 14 - Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Indirect
SDG 15 - Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification and halt and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss
Direct
SDG 16 - Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Direct
SDG 17 - Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise the global partnership for sustainable development
Indirect
Curriculum Development
Direct
Forests/Trees
Indirect
Plants & Animals
Indirect
Waste
Indirect
Priority Action Area 1 - Advancing policy
state:
Direct
Priority Action Area 3 - Developing capacities of educators and trainers
state:
Direct
Priority Action Area 4 - Mobilizing youth
state:
Indirect
Update:
No